The latest medical research on Advanced Heart Failure & Transplant Cardiology

Pregnancy imposes significant cardiovascular adaptations, including progressive increases in plasma volume and cardiac output. For most women, this physiological adaptation resolves at the end of pregnancy, but some women develop pathological dilatation and ultimately heart failure late in pregnancy or in the postpartum period, manifesting as peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM). Despite the mortality risk of this form of heart failure, the molecular mechanisms underlying PPCM have not been extensively examined in human hearts.

Protein and metabolite profiles from left ventricular tissue of end-stage PPCM patients (N=6-7) were compared with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM; N=5-6) and nonfailing donors (N=7-18) using unbiased quantitative mass spectrometry. All samples were derived from the Sydney Heart Bank. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD055986. Differential protein expression and metabolite abundance and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses were performed.

Proteomic analysis identified 2 proteins, SBSPON (somatomedin B and thrombospondin type 1 domain-containing protein precursor) and TNS3 (tensin 3), that were uniquely downregulated in PPCM. SBSPON, an extracellular matrix protein, and TNS3, involved in actin remodeling and cell signaling, may contribute to impaired tissue remodeling and fibrosis in PPCM. Metabolomic analysis revealed elevated levels of homogentisate and deoxycholate and reduced levels of lactate and alanine in PPCM, indicating disrupted metabolic pathways and glucose utilization. Both PPCM and DCM shared pathways related to inflammation, immune responses, and signal transduction. However, thyroid hormone signaling was notably reduced in PPCM, affecting contractility and calcium handling through altered expression of PLN (phospholamban) and Sarcoendoplasmic Reticulum Calcium ATPase (SERCA). Enhanced endoplasmic reticulum stress and altered endocytosis pathways in PPCM suggested additional mechanisms of energy metabolism disruption.

The present study reveals unique posttranslational molecular features of the PPCM myocardium, which mediates cellular and metabolic remodeling, and holds promise as potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

Cardiorenal dysfunction with impaired cyclic GMP (cGMP) response is common in patients presenting with acute heart failure (HF). Type V phosphodiesterase (PDEV) is known to be upregulated in HF and may explain the dysfunction of renal response. The aim of this study was to determine whether B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) alone or in combination with PDEV inhibition improves renal function and increases urinary sodium and cGMP excretion in acute HF.

This open-label study included 67 patients hospitalized with acute HF and renal dysfunction. Patients were randomized to standard care, low-dose intravenous BNP (0.005 µg/kg per minute), or combination BNP/PDEV inhibition with sildenafil (25 mg q12 hours) for 48 hours. The coprimary end points were the percent change in estimated glomerular filtration rate and blood urea nitrogen from baseline to 48 hours.

Treatment with BNP and BNP/PDEV inhibitor significantly increased plasma cGMP at 24 hours (+25.6% [+9.8%, +84.7%] and +60.8% [+32.3%, +103.8%] for BNP and BNP/PDEV versus -13.5% [-29.1%, +14.2%] with standard care; P=0.001). However, there was no significant change in estimated glomerular filtration rate 0 (-10.8%, +12.7%) for standard care versus 0 (-15.3%, +11.8%) for the BNP group versus -8.8% (-14.3%, +8.3%) for the BNP/PDEV group (P=0.60) or blood urea nitrogen -1.4% (-10.7%, +12.0%) for standard care versus -5.9% (-14.6%, +9.4%) for the BNP group versus +6.9% (-5.3%, +18.8%) for the BNP/PDEV group (P=0.38) between groups. Hypotension was more common in the BNP/PDEV inhibitor group.

BNP and combination BNP/PDEV inhibition increased plasma cGMP in patients with acute HF but did not improve renal function or urinary sodium/cGMP excretion. Our study does not support the use of intravenous low-dose BNP with or without PDEV inhibition to enhance renal function in patients admitted with acute HF.

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00972569.

Worsening renal function (WRF) is common in hospitalized patients being treated for acute heart failure. However, discriminating clinically significant WRF remains challenging. In patients hospitalized with acute heart failure, we evaluated if blood and urine biomarkers of cardiac and kidney dysfunction were associated with adverse outcomes.

We identified 175 of 927 participants in the AKINESIS study (Acute Kidney Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin Evaluation of Symptomatic Heart Failure Study) who met criteria for stage 1 or 2 Kidney Disease: Improvement Global Outcomes acute kidney injury during the first 3 days of hospitalization. We measured 24 blood and urine biomarkers from specimens collected within 24 hours of meeting acute kidney injury criteria. The primary composite outcome consisted of worsening WRF (higher acute kidney injury stage), need for dialysis, or death at 30 days. Biomarkers' association with the composite outcome was assessed with logistic regression by tertiles and area under the curve (AUC).

Of the 175 participants, 32 (18%) developed the primary composite outcome. Only history of chronic kidney disease was significantly different between those with and without the composite outcome. The highest tertile of plasma Gal-3 (galectin-3) and urine epidermal growth factor were associated with increased odds of the composite outcome compared with the lowest tertile in unadjusted analyses. After adjusting for serum creatinine, systolic blood pressure, and blood urea nitrogen, only the highest tertile of Gal-3 was associated with greater odds of the composite outcome (odds ratio, 4.6 [95% CI, 1.4-16.0). Gal-3 had the highest AUC (0.70 [95% CI, 0.58-0.82]), while epidermal growth factor had a lower AUC (0.63 [95% CI, 0.53-0.74]). Notably, urine biomarkers of kidney tubule injury were not associated with the composite outcome.

Tubular injury does not occur in most patients with acute heart failure experiencing WRF, consistent with the functional mechanisms of WRF in this patient population.

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01291836?term=NCT01291836&rank=1; Unique identifier: NCT01291836.

Multidisciplinary Shock Teams have improved clinical outcomes for cardiogenic shock, but their implementation costs have not been studied. This study's objective was to compare costs between patients treated with and without a Shock Team and determine if the team's implementation is cost-effective compared with standard of care.

We examined patients with refractory cardiogenic shock treated with or without a Shock Team at a tertiary academic hospital from 2009 to 2018. Real-world hospital data were used to compare costs and outcomes, including survival at discharge, 1-year survival, and quality-adjusted life years gained at 1 year. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated over a 1-year time horizon, with parameter uncertainty evaluated through probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 1000 second-order Monte Carlo simulations.

The study involved 244 patients, with 123 treated by the Shock Team and 121 receiving standard of care. Patients were predominantly male (77.5%), with a mean age of 58 (18-92) years. The Shock Team approach improved survival rates at hospital discharge and 1-year follow-up (61.0% versus 47.9%; P=0.04 and 55.0% versus 40.5%; P=0.03, respectively). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for increases in survival probability at discharge for the multidisciplinary Shock Team compared with standard of care was $102 088. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for increases in survival probability at 1-year was estimated at $96 152 and at $127 862 per 1 quality-adjusted life year gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis estimates showed that the Shock Team was cost-effective in the majority of simulations using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000, while it was also dominant in almost one-third of the simulations.

The Shock Team approach for treating refractory cardiogenic shock may be a cost-effective alternative to traditional standard of care. These findings can help prioritize the implementation of Shock Team initiatives to further improve cardiogenic shock outcomes.