The latest medical research on General Surgery

The research magnet gathers the latest research from around the web, based on your specialty area. Below you will find a sample of some of the most recent articles from reputable medical journals about general surgery gathered by our medical AI research bot.

The selection below is filtered by medical specialty. Registered users get access to the Plexa Intelligent Filtering System that personalises your dashboard to display only content that is relevant to you.

Want more personalised results?

Request Access

A new technology for medical and surgical data organisation: the WSES-WJES Decentralised Knowledge Graph.

World J Emerg Surg

The quality of Big Data analysis in medicine and surgery heavily depends on the methods used for clinical data collection, organization, and storage. The Knowledge Graph (KG) represents knowledge through a semantic model, enhancing connections between diverse and complex information. While it can improve the quality of health data collection, it has limitations that can be addressed by the Decentralized (blockchain-powered) Knowledge Graph (DKG). We report our experience in developing a DKG to organize data and knowledge in the field of emergency surgery.

The authors leveraged the cyb.ai protocol, a decentralized protocol within the Cosmos network, to develop the Emergency Surgery DKG. They populated the DKG with relevant information using publications from the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) featured in the World Journal of Emergency Surgery (WJES). The result was the Decentralized Knowledge Graph (DKG) for the WSES-WJES bibliography.

Utilizing a DKG enables more effective structuring and organization of medical knowledge. This facilitates a deeper understanding of the interrelationships between various aspects of medicine and surgery, ultimately enhancing the diagnosis and treatment of different diseases. The system's design aims to be inclusive and user-friendly, providing access to high-quality surgical knowledge for healthcare providers worldwide, regardless of their technological capabilities or geographical location. As the DKG evolves, ongoing attention to user feedback, regulatory frameworks, and ethical considerations will be critical to its long-term success and global impact in the surgical field.

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) enhances hemodynamic stability decreasing analgesic requirements in surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs).

World J Emerg Surg

To evaluate the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on intraoperative hemodynamic stability, opioid and inhalation anesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesic effects in patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs).

We retrospectively reviewed 173 patients who underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures between May 2020 and December 2023. The patients were allocated into the ESPB group or the control group. Demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, total intraoperative opioid consumption, the average minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhalational anesthetics, postoperative simple analgesics and opioid consumption and the length of hospital stay were included in the analysis.

Compared with the control group, the ESPB group had a lower heart rate (HR) in the first 90 min after surgical incision and lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the beginning of surgery. Intraoperatively, a notable reduction in fentanyl consumption was observed in the ESPB group (p = 0.004), whereas no significant difference was observed in the average MAC of inhalational agents (p = 0.073). Postoperatively, the ESPB group required fewer doses of simple analgesics in the first 24 h (p < 0.001) and 48 h (p = 0.029). No statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay (p = 0.608) was observed between the groups.

ESPB was shown to enhance intraoperative hemodynamic stability, reduce opioid consumption and decrease postoperative analgesic consumption in patients who underwent SSRF. These results suggest that ESPB may serve as a valuable component of multimodal analgesia protocols for SSRF. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the results and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Cost-Effectiveness of Nonoperative Management vs Upfront Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Pediatric Uncomplicated Appendicitis Over 1 Year.

American College of Surgeons

Non-operative management (NOM) with antibiotics alone for pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis is accepted to be safe and effective. However, the relative cost-effectiveness of this approach compared to appendectomy remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of non-operative versus operative management for pediatric uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

A trial-based real-world economic evaluation from the healthcare sector perspective was performed using data collected from a multi-institutional non-randomized controlled trial investigating NOM versus surgery. The time horizon was 1 year, with costs in 2023 US dollars. Ratio of costs-to-charges (RCC)-based data for the initial hospitalization, readmissions, and unplanned emergency department visits were extracted from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). Utility data were derived from patient-reported disability days and health-related quality-of-life scores. Multiple scenarios and one-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses accounted for parameter uncertainty. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) or disability-adjusted life year (DALY). Primary outcome measures included total and incremental mean costs, QALY, DALY, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

Of 1,068 participants, 370 (35%) selected NOM and 698 (65%) selected urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. Operative management cost an average of $9,791/patient and yielded an average of 0.884 QALYs while NOM cost an average of $8,044/patient and yielded an average of 0.895 QALYs. NOM was both less costly and more effective in base case and scenario analyses using disability days and alternate methods of calculating utilities.

NOM is cost-effective compared to laparoscopic appendectomy for pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis over 1 year.

Does time to operating room affect outcomes after pediatric blunt hollow viscus injury? A Trauma Quality Improvement Program analysis.

J Trauma Acute Care

Blunt hollow viscus injuries (HVIs) are relatively rare and difficult to diagnose. Whether a delay in operative intervention impacts outcomes for pediatric patients with blunt HVI has not been investigated via analysis of multicenter databases.

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

We identified 1,700 patients, including 147 (9%) who were operated on >24 hours after arrival. Patients with delayed operations demonstrated higher Injury Severity Scores and higher Abbreviated Injury Scale scores for the head, face, and upper extremities and were more likely to require an orthopedic operation. Patients who received a delayed operation were less likely to have full-thickness injury noted in the operating room and demonstrated longer hospital and intensive care unit stays. However, there was no difference in superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, organ space SSI, severe sepsis, or mortality between groups.

Diagnosis and operative intervention for blunt HVI may be delayed in the presence of distracting injuries and in the absence of full-thickness perforation. While these patients typically have a more severe injury profile and require longer hospital stays, they do not appear to have increased rates of SSI, sepsis, or mortality.

Broadening indications: A descriptive and comparative in-depth analysis of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outcomes in trauma and nontrauma patients.

J Trauma Acute Care

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) has been used for medical etiologies of acute respiratory distress syndrome refractory to conventional management. More recently, VV ECMO has been used to stabilize trauma patients with acute lung injury. We hypothesize that patients with traumatic injuries requiring VV ECMO have similar survival outcomes and describe the characteristics between the two populations.

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

A total of 516 patients were identified (438 nontrauma and 78 trauma VV ECMO patients). The trauma patient, defined as undergoing cannulation during initial trauma admission, had a median age of 29 years with 81% of patients being male, while the nontrauma patient had a median age of 41 years with 64% being males. Trauma VV ECMO patients had shorter ECMO courses (216 hours vs. 372 hours, p < 0.001), earlier cannulation (8 hours vs. 120 hours, p < 0.001), higher lactic acid levels precannulation (4.2 mmol/L vs. 2.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (13 vs. 11, p = 0.001), and higher Simplified Acute Physiology Scores II (63 vs. 48, p < 0.001). There was no difference in bleeding complications. Survival to discharge rates were similar between trauma and nontrauma VV ECMO groups (69% vs. 71%, p = 0.81).

This study demonstrates that trauma VV ECMO patients have higher markers of severe illness/injury when compared with their nontrauma VV ECMO counterparts yet have similar survival rates and shorter ECMO runs. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients is a useful treatment modality for refractory hypoxemia, respiratory acidosis, and stabilization because of acute lung and thoracic injury.

Percutaneous and endoscopic transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting in acute cholecystitis-A viable long-term option in high-risk patients?

J Trauma Acute Care

The prolonged use of percutaneous cholecystostomy tubes (PCTs) in patients with acute cholecystitis, deemed inoperable, is fraught with complications. Transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting (TCDS) is an alternative technique that restores the physiologic outflow of bile, avoiding the need for an external drain. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of this approach remain unclear. We sought to prospectively assess the safety and efficacy of this procedure, performed via percutaneous or endoscopic approach, in high-risk patients presenting with acute cholecystitis.

Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level V.

Transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting was successful in 67 (percutaneous in 45/50; endoscopic in 22/23) of 73 patients (92%) attempted. Over a median follow-up period of 17 months (7, 26), 10 patients (15%) developed stent blockage or migration; all but two had their stent successfully replaced. Five patients (7%) developed mild, self-limited pancreatitis. Five (7%) patients underwent interval cholecystectomy at a median time of 7 months.

Transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting is a safe and promising definitive alternative to chronic PCT in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis that eliminates the discomfort and complications of long-term external drainage.

Long-term accuracy of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit risk score: Analysis of the impact of comorbidities on mortality 5 years after emergency laparotomy.

J Trauma Acute Care

The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) risk prediction tool has demonstrated superiority in predicting 30-day mortality after emergency laparotomy (EL). The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of NELA in calculating long-term (5 year) mortality and determine factors predicting long-term risk of death after EL.

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

From a total of 758 patients, observed mortality continued to increase from 15.4% at 1 year up to 31.4% at 5 years. The NELA risk score accurately classified deceased patients at both 1 year (c = 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.85) and 5 years (c = 0.82, 0.79-0.85) after EL. History of ascites (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.3; 1.0-11.3; p = 0.048), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aOR, 1.9; 1.1-3.4; p = 0.030), congestive heart failure (aOR, 3.6; 1.2-11.5; p = 0.025), myocardial infarction (aOR, 2.6; 1.5-4.6; p = 0.001), and a new cancer diagnosis (aOR, 2.8; 1.7-4.8; p < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for death 5 years after EL.

Long-term prognosis after EL remains poor for at least 5 years postoperatively. The NELA score is accurately able to predict risk of death up to 5 years after EL. History of ascites, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and a new diagnosis of cancer were independent prognostic factors for long-term mortality after EL.

Thromboembolism prophylaxis timing is associated with center mortality in traumatic brain injury: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program retrospective analysis.

J Trauma Acute Care

Timing of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis (VTEPPx) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is complex given concerns for potential worsening of hemorrhage. While timing of VTEPPx for TBI patients is known to vary at the patient level, to our knowledge, variation at the hospital level and correlation with quality metrics have not been quantified in a cohort of nonneurosurgical patients.

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Of 132,028 patients included in the current study, 38.7% received care at centers in the earliest quartile of VTEPPx timing, classified as Early (others labeled Delayed). Patients receiving care at Early centers presented with severe TBI at a similar rate to Delayed (17.4% vs. 19.0%; absolute standardized mean difference, 0.04). Early center patients more commonly received unfractionated heparin as opposed to low-molecular-weight heparin compared with Delayed (40.5% vs. 27.6%; absolute standardized mean difference, 0.28). At the center level, 12% of observed variation in VTEPPx was attributable to differential hospital practices. Overall trauma volume (r = -0.22, p < 0.001) and TBI volume (r = -0.19, p < 0.001) were inversely associated with risk-adjusted VTEPPx timing. In addition, centers initiating VTEPPx earlier had lower overall (r = 0.17, p < 0.001) and TBI-related mortality (r = 0.17, p < 0.001).

There is significant center-level variation in timing of VTEPPx among TBI patients. Earlier VTEPPx was associated with improved center outcomes overall and among TBI patients, supporting usage of VTEPPx timing as a holistic measure of quality.

Competency, Proficiency, and Mastery: Learning Curves for Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy at 16 International Expert Centers.

Annals of Surgery

The aim of this study was to evaluate the different phases of the learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) in international expert centers.

RDP is an emerging minimally invasive approach; however, only limited, mostly single center data are available on its safe implementation, including the learning curve.

Consecutive patients undergoing elective RDP from 16 expert centers across three continents were included to assess the learning curve. Based on the first 100 RDPs at each center, three cutoffs were used to define the learning curve: operative time for competency, major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) for proficiency, and textbook outcome for mastery. Clinical outcomes before and after the cutoffs were compared.

The learning curve analysis was conducted on 1109 of 2403 RDPs. Competency, proficiency, and mastery, respectively, were reached after 46, 63, and 73 RDP procedures. After competency, operative time decreased from 245 to 235 minutes (P=0.002). Attaining proficiency was reflected by a reduction in the rate of major complications from 20% to 15% (P=0.012), and mastery was associated with a higher proportion of patients with textbook outcome (71% vs. 63%; P=0.028). The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate remained stable along the learning curve, ranging between 18.5% and 21.5%. Previous laparoscopic experience accelerated the learning process by virtue of reduced operative time and an earlier decrease in major complications.

Competency, proficiency, and mastery for RDP were reached after 46, 63, and 73 procedures, respectively, at international expert centers. The findings highlight that the learning curves for intraoperative parameters are completed earlier; however, extensive experience is needed to master RDP.

A systematic review of ultrasonography-guided transcutaneous fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of laryngeal malignancy.

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Direct laryngoscopy and biopsy is the gold standard for obtaining a tissue diagnosis in patients with suspected laryngeal cancer. In patients with advanced disease or other medical comorbidities, this may come with significant anaesthetic risks, including tracheostomy. Ultrasonography-guided biopsy has been widely used in the diagnosis of malignancy involving cervical lymph nodes but it is not commonly employed in the diagnosis of laryngeal tumours. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the literature looking at whether ultrasonography-guided transcutaneous fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is an adequate method in diagnosing laryngeal malignancy.

Two independent researchers conducted a systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE® and Cochrane Library databases in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

A total of 568 studies were identified from the search, of which 3 met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 162 patient episodes. The pooled accuracy of transcutaneous FNAC in acquiring a sample adequate for histological diagnosis was 74.9%. Data on complications were limited, with a few cases of mild haemoptysis being recorded.

Transcutaneous FNAC can be considered a safe and quick method for establishing a histological diagnosis of laryngeal lesions, particularly in patients who may be severely comorbid, and it could therefore could reduce the risks of general anaesthesia and tracheostomy prior to commencing definitive treatment.

Ultrasonic dissection versus electrocautery dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a randomized controlled trial (SONOCHOL-trial).

World J Emerg Surg

The trial was registered prior to conducting the research on http://clinical.

gov , NCT03014817.

From September 2019 to March 2023, 300 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to electrocautery dissection (n = 148) and ultrasonic dissection (n = 152). No significant difference in complication rate was observed between the groups (risk difference [RD] 1.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI], - 7.2% to 10.4%, P = 0.720). No significant disparities in operating time, conversion rate, hospital stay or readmission rates between the groups were noted. Haemostatic agents were more frequently used in electrocautery dissection (RD 10.6%, 95% CI, 1.3% to 19.8%, P = 0.025).

Ultrasonic dissection and electrocautery dissection demonstrate comparable risks for complications in emergency surgery for patients with acute cholecystitis. Ultrasonic dissection is a viable alternative to electrocautery dissection or can be used as a complementary method in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Variation in surgery postponement rates in the NHS in England.

Br J Surg

Postponement of surgery at preoperative assessment in the days or weeks before the patient is admitted for surgery, as distinct from cancellation on the planned day of surgery, can be devastating for patients and an inefficient use of finite resources. However, postponements are often poorly recorded. The primary aim of this pilot study was to investigate elective surgical postponement rates during or after preoperative assessment across England, and the reasons for postponement for patients on an elective surgical pathway.

A retrospective analysis of clinical audit data from 16 National Health Service (NHS) trusts in England was undertaken. Data were collected during a two-week period in March 2024 on all postponements within a service. The primary outcome of interest was the postponement rate.

Some 8000 case notes were reviewed. There were 583 (7.3%) postponements. Postponement rates across trusts varied from 31.9% to 1.0%. Significantly shorter time from referral to preoperative assessment was observed for day-case patients, urgent patients, patients without early screening and patients without a 'to come in' date in place. Of the 342 routine patients, 293 (85.7%) had postponements for medical rather than pathways or process reasons. Half of all routine patients waited over 94 days and a quarter of patients waited 198 days from being added to a patient tracking list to preoperative assessment.

Minimizing postponements and improving preoperative assessment efficiency should be part of wider initiatives to streamline perioperative pathways.