The latest medical research on Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery

The research magnet gathers the latest research from around the web, based on your specialty area. Below you will find a sample of some of the most recent articles from reputable medical journals about oral & maxillofacial surgery gathered by our medical AI research bot.

The selection below is filtered by medical specialty. Registered users get access to the Plexa Intelligent Filtering System that personalises your dashboard to display only content that is relevant to you.

Want more personalised results?

Request Access

Association of National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer Accreditation with Outcomes after Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Journal of the

The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) defined a set of standards in 2017 centered on multidisciplinary program structure, evidence-based care processes, and internal audit to address widely variable rectal cancer practices and outcomes across U.S. hospitals. There have been no studies to-date testing the association between NAPRC accreditation and rectal cancer outcomes.

This was a retrospective, observational study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-99 years with rectal cancer who underwent proctectomy from 2017-2020. The primary exposure was NAPRC accreditation and the primary outcomes included mortality (in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year) and 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations. Associations between NAPRC accreditation and each outcome were tested using multivariable logistic regression with risk-adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics.

Among 1,985 hospitals, 65 were NAPRC accredited (3.3%). Accredited hospitals were more likely to be nonprofit and teaching with ≥ 250 beds. Among 20,202 patients, 2,078 patients (10%) underwent proctectomy at an accredited hospital. Patients at accredited hospitals were more likely to have an elective procedure with a minimally invasive approach and sphincter preservation. Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs. 1.3%; p=0.002), 30-day mortality (2.1% vs. 2.9%; p<0.001), 30-day complication (18.3% vs. 19.4%; p=0.01), and 1-year mortality rates (11.0% vs. 12.1%; p<0.001) were significantly lower at accredited compared to non-accredited hospitals.

NAPRC accredited hospitals have lower risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality for major rectal cancer surgery. Although NAPRC standards address variability in practice, without directly addressing surgical safety, our findings suggest that NAPRC accredited hospitals may provide higher quality surgical care.

Benchmark Outcomes for Distal Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Prospective Snapshot Study (SPANDISPAN).

Journal of the

Improving the quality of care is a priority for health systems to obtain better care and reduce costs. One of the tools for measuring quality is benchmarking (BM). We presented a one-country prospective study of distal pancreatectomies (DP) and determined BM.

Prospective, multicenter, observational snapshot study of DP carried out at Spanish HPB centers for a year (February 22-January 23). HPB centers were defined as high-volume if they performed > 10 DP per year. Inclusion criteria: any scheduled DP for any diagnosis and age > 18 years. The low-risk group was defined following the Durin et al. criteria and major complications as Clavien-Dindo ≥ III.

313 patients from 42 centers and 46.6% from high-volume centers were included. Median DP by center was 7 (IQR: 5-10), median age was 65 years (IQR: 55-74), and 53.4% were female. The surgical approach was minimally invasive (MIS) in 69.3%. Major complications were 21.1%. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C rate was 20.1%, and 90-day mortality was 1.6%. One hundred and forty-three were low-risk group patients (43.8%). Compared with previous BM data, an increasing MIS rate and fewer hospital stay was obtained.

We present the first determination of DP-BM in a prospective series, obtaining similar results to the previous ones, but our BM values include a shorter hospital stay and a higher percentage of MIS probably related to ERAS protocols and prospective data collection. BM is a multiparameter valuable tool for reporting outcomes, comparing centers, and identifying the points to improve surgical care.

Unveiling the Hidden Consequences: The Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Colorectal Cancer Operation.

Journal of the

The COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected healthcare systems globally, resulting in significant delays and challenges in various medical treatments, particularly in cancer care. This study aims to investigate the repercussions of the pandemic on surgical interventions for colorectal cancer in the United States, using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the NCDB, encompassing adult patients who underwent surgical procedures for colon and rectal cancer in 2019 (pre-COVID) and 2020 (COVID). We examined various demographic and clinical variables, including patient characteristics, tumor staging, surgical approaches, and socioeconomic factors.

The analysis included 105,517 patients, revealing a 17.3% reduction in surgical cases during the initial year of the pandemic. Patients who underwent surgery in 2020 displayed more advanced clinical and pathological tumor stages compared to those treated in 2019. After diagnosis, no delay was reported in the treatment. Patients operated during the pandemic, African American patients, uninsured and Medicaid beneficiaries had worse stage colon and rectal cancer, and individuals with lower incomes bore the burden of advanced colon cancer.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer surgery transcends a mere decline in case numbers, resulting in a higher prevalence of patients with advanced disease. This study underscores the exacerbated disparities in cancer care, particularly affecting vulnerable populations. The COVID-19 pandemic has left a significant and enduring imprint on colorectal cancer surgery, intensifying the challenges faced by patients and healthcare systems. Comprehensive studies are imperative to comprehend the long-term consequences of delayed screenings, diagnoses, and treatments, as healthcare planning for the future must consider the unintended repercussions of pandemic-related disruptions.

Postoperative Opioid Prescribing via Rule-Based Guidelines Derived from In-Hospital Consumption: An Assessment of Efficacy Based on Post-Discharge Opioid Use.

Journal of the

Many institutions have developed operation-specific guidelines for opioid prescribing. These guidelines rarely incorporate in-hospital opioid consumption, which is highly correlated with consumption. We compare outcomes of several patient-centered approaches to prescribing that are derived from in-hospital consumption, including several experimental, rule-based prescribing guidelines and our current institutional guideline.

We performed a retrospective, cohort study of all adults undergoing surgery at a single academic medical center. Several rule-based guidelines, derived from in-hospital consumption (quantity of opioids consumed within 24 hours of discharge), were used to specify the theoretical quantity of opioid prescribed on discharge. The efficacy of the experimental guidelines was compared to three references: (a) an approximation of our institution's tailored prescribing guideline; (b) prescribing all patients the typical quantity of opioids consumed for patients undergoing the same operation; and (c) a representative rule-based, tiered framework. For each scenario, we calculated the penalized residual sum of squares (reflecting the composite deviation from actual patient consumption, with 15% penalty for over-prescribing) and the proportion of opioids consumed relative to prescribed.

1048 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean (SD) and median [IQR] quantity of opioids consumed within 24 hours of discharge was 11.2 (26.9) MME and 0 [0-15] MME. Median [IQR] post-discharge consumption was 16.0 [0-150] MME. Our institutional guideline and the previously validated rule-based guideline outperform alternate approaches, with median [IQR] differences in prescribed versus consumed opioids of 0 [-60 to 27.25] and 37.5 [-37.5 to 37.5], respectively, corresponding to penalized RSS of 39,817,602 and 38,336,895, respectively.

Rather than relying on fixed quantities for defined operations, rule-based guidelines offer a simple yet effective method for tailoring opioid prescribing to in-hospital consumption.

Overcoming Barriers: Sex Disparity in Surgeon Ergonomics.

Journal of the

Musculoskeletal discomfort is widely experienced by surgeons across multiple surgical specialties. Developing technologies and new minimally invasive techniques add further complexity and ergonomic stressors. These stressors differentially affect male and female surgeons, but little is known about the role these gender disparities play in surgical ergonomic stress. We reviewed existing literature to better understand how ergonomic stress varies between male and female surgeons.

A literature search was performed via Pubmed including but not limited to the topics: ergonomics, surgeons, female surgeons, women surgeons, pregnancy, operating room. A review of available quantitative data was performed.

Female surgeons endure more pronounced ergonomic discomfort than their male counterparts, with added ergonomic stress associated with pregnancy.

A four-fold method is proposed to overcome ergonomic barriers: 1) improved education on prevention and treatment of ergonomic injury for active surgeons and for trainees; 2) increased departmental and institutional support for ergonomic solutions for surgeons; 3) partnerships with industry to study innovative ergonomic solutions; and 4) additional research on the nature of surgical ergonomic challenges and the differential effects of surgical ergonomics on female surgeons.

Robotics vs Laparoscopy in Foregut Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Analyzing Hiatal Hernia Repair and Heller Myotomy.

Journal of the

Laparoscopic surgery remains the mainstay of treating foregut pathologies. Several studies have shown improved outcomes with the robotic approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs (HHR) and Heller myotomy (HM) repairs is needed.

PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between January 2010 and November 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool. Assessed outcomes included intra- and post-operative outcomes. We pooled the dichotomous data using the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model to report odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and continuous data to report mean difference (MD) and 95% CIs.

Twenty-two comparative studies enrolling 196,339 patients were included. Thirteen (13,426 robotic, 168,335 laparoscopic patients) studies assessed HHR outcomes, while nine (2,384 robotic, 12,225 laparoscopic patients) assessed HM outcomes. Robotic HHR had a non-significantly shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) [MD -0.41 (95% CI -0.87, -0.05)], fewer conversions to open [OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.03, 1.49)], and lower morbidity rates [OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.47, 1.23)]. Robotic HM led to significantly fewer esophageal perforations [OR 0.36 (95% CI 0.15, 0.83)], reinterventions [OR 0.18 (95% CI 0.07, 0.47)] a non-significantly shorter LOS [MD -0.31 (95% CI -0.62, 0.00)]. Both robotic HM and HHR had significantly longer operative times.

Laparoscopic and robotic HHR and HM repairs have similar safety profiles and perioperative outcomes. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare the two methods, given the low to moderate quality of included studies.

Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus: Is Esophagectomy Associated with Improved Overall Survival?

Journal of the

Esophagectomy in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is challenging and carries risk. The value of esophagectomy in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is not well-defined.

The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with cT4 esophageal adenocarcinoma from 2004-2020. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with use of esophagectomy. Cox modeling was used to identify factors associated with all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing esophagectomy were 1:1 propensity score-matched to patients treated non-surgically. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare five-year overall survival (OS).

3,703 patients met inclusion criteria. 541 (15%) underwent esophagectomy, 3,162 (85%) did not. Age ≤ 65 (aOR 1.69, [1.33, 2.14]), white race (aOR 2.98, [2.24, 3.96]), treatment in academic centers (aOR 1.64, [1.33, 2.02]), private insurance (aOR 1.88, [1.50, 2.36]), and tumors <6cm (aOR 1.86, [1.44, 2.40]) were associated with use of esophagectomy. Government/lack of insurance (HR 1.23, [1.12, 1.35]), income <$46,000 (HR 1.11, [1.03, 1.20]), treatment in non-academic centers (HR 1.16, [1.07, 1.25]), CCI ≥ 1 (HR 1.22, [1.12, 1.32]), and tumors ≥ 6 cm (HR 1.20, [1.09, 1.32]) were associated with risk of all-cause mortality. Esophagectomy (HR 0.50, [0.44, 0.56]) and systemic therapy (HR 0.40, [0.37, 0.43]) were associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing esophagectomy had higher rates of 5-year OS (27.4% vs 13.2%, p<0.0001) and longer median OS (24.71 vs. 10.09 months, p<0.0001). Among cT4b patients, those who underwent esophagectomy had higher rates of 5-year OS (24.5% vs 12.3%, p<0.0001) and longer median OS (25.53 vs. 11.01 months, p<0.0001).

In cT4 esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophagectomy is associated with improved rates of 5-year OS compared to non-surgical treatment.

Outcomes of Colectomy and Proctectomy According to Surgeon Training: General vs Colorectal Surgeons.

Journal of the

Colectomies and proctectomies are commonly performed by both general surgeons (GS) and colorectal surgeons (CRS). The aim of our study was to examine the outcomes of elective colectomy, urgent colectomy, and elective proctectomy according to surgeon training.

Data were obtained from the Vizient database for adults who underwent elective colectomy, urgent colectomy, and elective proctectomy from 2020-2022. Operations performed in the setting of trauma and patients within the database's highest relative expected mortality risk group were excluded. Outcomes were compared according to surgeon's specialty: GS vs. CRS. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was in-hospital complication rate. Data were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.

Of 149,516 elective colectomies, 75,711(50.6%) were performed by GS and 73,805(49.4%) by CRS. Compared to elective colectomies performed by CRS, elective colectomies performed by GS had higher rates of complications(4.9% vs. 3.9%, OR1.23, 95%CI 1.17-1.29,p<.01) and mortality(0.5% vs. 0.2%, OR2.06, 95%CI 1.72-2.47,p<.01). Of 71,718 urgent colectomies, 54,680(76.2%) were performed by GS, while 17,038(23.8%) were performed by CRS. Compared to urgent colectomies performed by CRS, urgent colectomies performed by GS were associated with higher rates of complications(12.1% vs. 10.4%, OR1.14, 95%CI 1.08-1.20,p<.01) and mortality (5.1% vs. 2.3%, OR2.08, 95%CI 1.93-2.23,p<.01). Of 43,749 elective proctectomies, 28,458(65.0%) were performed by CRS and 15,291(35.0%) by GS. Compared to proctectomies performed by CRS, those performed by GS were associated with higher rates of complications (5.3% vs. 4.4%, OR1.16, 95%CI 1.06-1.27,p<.01) and mortality(0.3% vs. 0.2%, OR1.49, 95%CI 1.02-2.20,p=.04).

In this nationwide study, colectomies and proctectomies performed by CRS were associated with improved outcomes compared to GS. Hospitals without a CRS on staff should consider prioritizing recruiting CRS specialists.

Incidence of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography after Subtotal Fenestrating and Reconstituting Cholecystectomy.

Journal of the

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) is used for the difficult cholecystectomy, but published experience with resource utilization for SC is limited. We hypothesized that the need for advanced resources are common after SC.

Retrospective review of laparoscopic cholecystectomies between 2017 and 2021 at a large center. SC cases were identified using a medical record tool. Baseline characteristics were assessed with student's t-test and chi-squared. Primary outcome was ERC within 60-days. Secondary outcomes were reconstituted SC on post-op ERC and length of stay (LOS). Uni- and multivariable logistic regression were used for binary outcomes. Multiple linear regression was used for LOS. Covariates included age, sex, BMI, ASA class.

A total of 1222 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed between 2017 and 2021. Of these, 87 (7%) were SC. Male (p<0.001) and older (p<0.001) patients were more likely to undergo SC. Odds of post-op ERC were higher in the SC group (OR 9.79 95% CI 5.90, 16.23 p<0.001). There was no difference in pre-op ERC (17% vs 21% p=0.38). Reconstituting SC had lower odds of post-op ERC (OR 0.12, 0.023-0.58, p=0.009). LOS was 1.81 times higher in the SC group(p=<0.001). Post-op ERC was not associated with LOS (p=.24).

We present one of the largest single-center series of SC. SC patients are more likely to be male, older, have higher ASA class, and have increased LOS. SC should be performed when access to ERC and interventional radiology is available. Absent these adjuncts, reconstituting SC decreases the need for early ERC, but long-term outcomes are unknown.

Collaborative Approach toward Transplant Candidacy for Obese End-Stage Renal Disease Patients.

American College of Surgeons

An elevated Body Mass Index (BMI) is a major cause of transplant preclusion for patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). This phenomenon exacerbates existing socioeconomic and racial disparities and increases the economic burden of maintaining patients on dialysis. Metabolic Bariatric Surgery (MBS) in such patients is not widely available. Our center created a collaborative program to undergo weight loss surgery before obtaining a kidney transplant.

We studied the outcomes of these patients post MBS and transplant surgery. One hundred and eighty-three ESRD patients were referred to the bariatric team by the transplant team between Jan 2019 through June 2023. Of these, 36 underwent MBS (20 RYGB, 16 SG), and 10 underwent subsequent transplantation, with another 15 currently waitlisted. Both surgical teams shared resources, including dieticians, social workers, and a common database, for easy transition between teams.

The mean starting BMI for all referrals was 46.4 kg/m2 and was 33.9 kg/m2 at the time of transplant. The average number of hypertension medications decreased from 2.0 (range 2.0 to 4.0) pre-surgery to 1.0 (range 1.0 to 3.0) post-surgery. Similarly, HbA1C levels improved, with pre-operative averages at 6.2 (range 5.4 to 7.6) and postoperative levels at 5.2 (range 4.6 to 5.8) All transplants are currently functioning, with a median creatinine of 1.5 (1.2 - 1.6) mg/dl (GFR 46 (36.3 - 71.0)).

A collaborative approach between bariatric and transplant surgery teams offers a pathway toward transplant for obese ESRD patients, and potentially alleviates existing healthcare disparities. ESRD patients that undergo MBS have unique complications to be aware of. The improvement in comorbidities may lead to superior post-transplant outcomes.

Barriers to Black Medical Students and Residents Pursuing and Completing Surgical Residency in Canada: A Qualitative Analysis.

American College of Surgeons

The limited available data suggest that the Canadian surgical workforce does not reflect the racial diversity of the patient population it serves, despite the well-established benefits of patient-provider race concordance. There have been no studies to date that characterize the systemic and individual challenges faced by Black medical students in matching to and successfully finishing training in a surgical specialty within a Canadian context that can explain this underrepresentation.

Using critical qualitative inquiry and purposive sampling to ensure gender, geographical, and student/trainee year heterogeneity, we recruited self-identifying Black medical students and surgical residents across Canada. Online in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed through an inductive reflexive narrative thematic process by four analysts.

27 participants including 18 medical students and 9 residents, were interviewed. The results showed three major themes that characterized their experiences: journey to and through medicine, perceptions of the surgical culture, and recommendations to improve the student experience. Medical students identified lack of mentorship and representation, as well as experiences with racism as the main barriers to pursuing surgical training. Surgical trainees cited systemic racism, lack of representation and insufficient safe spaces as the key deterrents to program completion. The intersection with gender exponentially increased these identified barriers.

Except for a few surgical programs, medical schools across Canada do not offer a safe space for Black students and trainees to access and complete surgical training. An urgent change is needed to provide diverse mentorship that is transparent, acknowledges the real challenges related to systemic racism and biases, and is inclusive of different racial and ethnic backgrounds.

Transition to Permitless Open Carry and Association with Firearm-Related Suicide.

Journal of the

Firearm-related death rates continue to rise in the United States. As some states enact more permissive firearm laws, we sought to assess the relationship between a change to permitless open carry and subsequent firearm-related death rates, a currently understudied topic.

Using state-level data from 2013-2021, we performed a linear panel analysis using state fixed-effects. We examined total firearm-related death, suicide, and homicide rates separately. If a significant association between open carry law and death rate was found, we then performed a difference-in-difference analysis to assess for a causal relationship between changing to permitless open carry and increased death rate. For significant difference-in-difference results, we performed confirmatory difference-in-difference separating firearm and non-firearm death rates.

Nineteen states maintained a no open carry or permit-required law, while five changed to permitless, and 26 had a permitless open carry prior to 2013. Fixed-effects model indicated more permissive open carry law was associated with increased total firearm-related deaths and suicides. In difference-in-difference, changing law to permitless open carry had a significant average treatment effect on the treated of 1.57 (95% CI 1.05-2.09) for total suicide rate, but no significant for total firearm-related death rate. Confirmatory difference-in-difference found a significant average treatment effect on the treated of 1.18 (95% CI 0.90-1.46) for firearm suicide rate.

Open carry law is associated with total firearm-related death and suicide rates. Based on our difference-in-difference results, changing to permitless open carry is indeed strongly associated with increased suicides by firearm.