The latest medical research on Audiology

Dysphagia services have only recently been formalised within Chinese health services. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia services practice in China.

To provide a profile for the dysphagia practice in China by assessing various facets of dysphagia services.

This is a survey study carried out from December 2022 to May 2023 online in China. One hundred fifty-nine respondents comprising doctors, nurses or therapists involved in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation completed a questionnaire via Sojump. The questionnaire included dichotomous (e.g., yes/no) and multiple-choice questions related to participants' general information and their provision of dysphagia management services. Results were analysed descriptively and the differences among different levels of hospitals were analysed.

Approximately two-thirds of hospitals (67.9%) started dysphagia services within the last 5 years. A significant difference in the initiation of dysphagia rehabilitation was observed across different hospital levels (χ2  = 32.70;p < 0.001). Routine dysphagia screening was a standard practice in most hospitals (71.7%), with the most frequently employed screening method being the water swallow test (95.6%). Clinical swallowing evaluation emerged as the preferred initial assessment method (80.5%) and the most utilised assessment method (91.8%). Video fluoroscopic swallow study and flexible endoscopic evaluation swallowing were used by 22.7% and 12.6% of respondents. A significant difference was observed in the choice of assessment methods across hospitals of different levels (χ2 = 43.397; p < 0.001). The majority of respondents (53.5%) primarily employed rehabilitation as the main intervention method (76%-100%). Most respondents indicated that they would reevaluate patients after treatment (74.8%) and reported routine follow-up with patients (60.4%).

What is already known on this subject Assessment and treatment methods for dysphagia are various across different patients, medical facilities and settings. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia rehabilitation practice in China. What this study adds to existing knowledge The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China through an online survey. We found that the relatively recent development of dysphagia management in China, but the practice patterns uncovered in this study are broadly consistent with Chinese guidelines and consensus. Variations in practice patterns between hospitals of different levels may be attributed to resource constraints and patient needs. Besides, while rehabilitation exercises are the primary intervention method for dysphagia in China, the assessment largely centres on clinical swallowing evaluation. The use of instrumental assessments remains low, resulting in a lack of objective evaluation of patient conditions and outcomes. What are the clinical implications of this work? The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China, and the results indicate that the use of instrumental assessments needs to be improved and there is a need for policy and resource support in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation in China.

This study aimed to evaluate long-term cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in individuals with mono-allelic pathogenic variants in WFS1, which is associated with both Wolfram-like syndrome and DFNA6/14/38.

Retrospective case series.

Seven CI recipients, ranging from eight months to 58 years of age, were included in the study, including four with Wolfram-like syndrome and three with DFNA6/14/38. A total of ten cochlear implantations were performed among these subjects.

At one-year post-implantation, a mean phoneme score of 90 ± 9% at 65 dB SPL in quiet was found, which remained stable up to ten years post-implantation with a mean phoneme score of 94 ± 6%. Despite these excellent outcomes, one subject achieved no speech recognition with CI and eventually became a non-user. This individual had a prolonged absence of auditory stimulation prior to implantation and encountered multiple challenges during rehabilitation.

Individuals with Wolfram-like syndrome or DFNA6/14/38 demonstrate consistently good outcomes following implantation, which remain stable over time. These findings affirm cochlear implantation as an effective rehabilitation option for these individuals. Furthermore, the stable and good CI outcomes contradict the suggested link between WFS1-associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate threshold and suprathreshold auditory risk from a newly popular platform of music concert entertainment; virtual reality (VR) headsets. Recreational noise exposure to music is the primary source of hearing hazard in young-adults, with noise doses of in-person concert venues and music festivals well in excess of the recommended daily exposure recommendation from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. While research on the relationship between personal music players and noise-induced hearing loss risk is abundant, no study has yet evaluated noise-induced hearing loss risk from VR headsets, which are newest to the commercial market at this time.

Thirty-one young-adult participants (18 to 25 years) with normal-hearing sensitivity (0 to 16 dB HL) experienced a VR music concert and participated in three data collection timepoints: Session A preexposure, Session A post-exposure, and Session B post-exposure. Participants underwent baseline testing for audiometry (0.25 to 20 kHz), distortion product otoacoustic emission testing (1 to 10 kHz), and Words-in-Noise testing. Participants then wore a commercially available VR headset (Meta Quest 2) and experienced a freely available online VR music concert (via the video-sharing website "YouTube"). The VR music concert duration was 90 min set to maximum volume, which yielded an average sound level equivalent of 78.7 dBA, max sound level of 88.2 dBA, and LC peak sound level of 98.6 dBA. Post-exposure testing was conducted immediately at the conclusion of the VR concert, and again within 24 hr to 1 week after the exposure. Participants also answered a questionnaire that estimated noise exposure history (National Acoustics Laboratory "Noise Calculator").

Post-exposure deficit was not observed in DPOAEs or Words-in-Noise score (p's > 0.05). However, statistically significant temporary post-exposure deficit was observed in audiometry at 4, 8, and 12.5 kHz (p's < 0.05) (mean differences: 2 to 3 dB HL). Twenty-four hours and 1-week post-exposure measurements revealed no permanent changes from baseline measurements (p's > 0.05) aside from one spurious difference at 12.5 kHz. Males tended to exhibit a significantly higher noise history score on average than females. The primary, secondary, and tertiary sources of noise hazard history in this young-adult cohort included amplified music.

These preliminary data suggest that VR music concerts-which are likely to produce a substantially lower noise dose than in-person music concerts-may still be capable of producing at least slight, temporary threshold shifts on the order of 2 to 3 dB HL. Future research should include VR headsets in personal music player risk assessment, as the VR music concert platform is increasing rapidly in popularity among young-adults.

To investigate the effects of automatic scene classification (SCAN) on speech perception in noise and real-world functional performance in children using cochlear implants (CIs).

We used a within-subjects repeated measures design in two studies. The first study assessed speech perception in noise with or without SCAN enabled in 25 school-aged children. The second study evaluated functional auditory performance in real life. Parents of 18 children provided ratings using the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/oral Performance of Children (PEACH) questionnaire; and children provided ratings using the Self Evaluation of Listening Function (SELF) questionnaire. Analyses of variance with repeated measures were used to examine the effect of SCAN.

On average, speech perception in noise was significantly better with SCAN enabled (mean SRT: -4.1 dB; SD: 4.0), compared to SCAN disabled (mean SRT: 0.5 dB; SD: 3.5). Children's functional performance in real life was similar between the two device settings.

Automatic auditory scene classification provides significant benefits for speech perception in noise (4.6 dB improvement). On average, there were no perceived detrimental or beneficial effects in real life. These findings support the use of SCAN in CIs for young children.